Welcome to Plan B Nation

Featured

if it makes you fly...

Decem­ber 31, 2008. It’s New Year’s Eve, and I’m not at a party or hav­ing din­ner with friends or even at home alone with pop­corn, watch­ing Times Square on TV. Instead, I’m on a 10-day silent med­i­ta­tion retreat, mil­lions of psy­chic miles from my fren­zied if ful­fill­ing job at Har­vard Law School.

For the past five years, I’ve penned speeches for Dean Elena Kagan, jug­gling dead­lines with cups of cof­fee at my sto­ried alma mater, but when I get home one week later, every­thing has changed. Dur­ing my silent sojourn, my boss was tapped to become Solic­i­tor Gen­eral, soon to join the fledg­ling Obama admin­is­tra­tion in Wash­ing­ton D.C. (As it hap­pens, this will be short stop, en route to the U.S. Supreme Court.)

Four months later, I’m newly unem­ployed at the peak of the Great Reces­sion. A rue­ful refrain runs through my mind: But I did every­thing right! This is not what my life is sup­posed to look like!

Wel­come to Plan B Nation.

Once upon a time, not so long ago, it seemed rea­son­able to think that with edu­ca­tion, hard work, and a mod­icum of luck we could chart a course in our lives—Plan A—and fol­low it through to the end.

Today, these assump­tions no longer hold. Glob­al­iza­tion, lay­offs (actual or feared), the fore­clo­sure cri­sis, the wide­spread demise of tra­di­tional pen­sions, the roller coaster stock market—these are some of the fac­tors turn­ing once-stable lives upside down.

Plan B—it’s the new Plan A!” I quipped to a friend who was, like me, fac­ing an unex­pected reversal.

Plan A, that’s so 20th-century,” I said to another.

But if Plan B Nation brings chal­lenges, it also brings new pos­si­bil­i­ties and options. The trick is to find­ing new ways to work with things as they are.

As I recently wrote in Salon, thriv­ing in Plan B Nation requires us to exer­cise many tra­di­tional Amer­i­can virtues: For­ti­tude, faith, patience, courage, and self-control.

To this list, I would also add inge­nu­ity and a flex­i­ble, open per­spec­tive. In essence, we need to become artists of life. Rather than sim­ply wish­ing things were dif­fer­ent, we need to make cre­ative use of the mate­ri­als at hand.

Over the next weeks and months, this blog will be explor­ing just how we go about that. I’ll be shar­ing per­sonal sto­ries (my own and those of fel­low trav­el­ers) while also tak­ing a look at books and research help­ful in nav­i­gat­ing Plan B Nation. Please join the conversation–and if you’re so inclined, help me spread the word.

In the mean­time, I’d love to hear from you! Are there issues you’d like to see addressed? Do you have sug­ges­tions for blog posts or fea­tures? Other thoughts or con­cerns? Please let me know.

Again, Wel­come to Plan B Nation.

And now, let’s get started.

I should be you

140/365 Envy

The mind gets a lot of crazy ideas.  (Well at least mine does, and I sus­pect if you pay atten­tion, you’ll find that yours does too.)

In recent weeks, it’s taken to sug­gest­ing that I should be some­one else. Now who this per­son is varies, depend­ing on the day, my mood, and what I’ve been read­ing or think­ing about.  And the fact is, if you lined up all the peo­ple my mind tells me I should be, you’d find that their behav­iors and beliefs are often quite clearly at odds. But my mind doesn’t care about that. It’s quite con­vinced that it’s entirely right—and it’s out to con­vince me too.

My mind has been espe­cially insis­tent since dis­cov­er­ing The Flu­ent Self, a blog-cum-transformational play­space cre­ated by Havi Brooks.  “You should be Havi,” my mind clam­ors. “She is doing such inter­est­ing things, and she talks about them in such inter­est­ing ways. You should be her not you! I can help you do that.”

It’s taken some time, but I am finally get­ting my mind to accept that this is not going to hap­pen. A major break­through came when I showed my mind this video of Havi doing her Shiva Nata yoga prac­tice wear­ing a pink wig.

You see that?” I said to my mind. “That is Havi. That is not us. We can learn from her. But we are never ever ever going to be her.”

On hear­ing this, my mind became a bit dis­con­so­late, though after watch­ing the video twice, it allowed that it was likely true.

As is often—if not always—the case, the trick is to find some­thing between the all and the noth­ing. What does my mind’s crush on Havi have to tell me? For one thing, it’s about my need to be more play­ful. It’s about doing more to find my tribe and build­ing a com­mu­nity. And maybe it even means trav­el­ing to Port­land to attend Rally (Rally!)

It also helps to remind myself that how­ever crazy in love my mind may be with some­one else’s life or work, there are oth­ers to whom my own life and work speak in sim­i­lar ways. This came home to me a few months back, when I became friendly with a writer I’ve long admired. I was thrilled when she told me she liked some­thing I’d writ­ten but then rushed to send her an essay that I thought was way better—one of my all-time favorites penned by another writer.

Some days later, I got this care­ful response:  “As for X’s piece…honestly? Between us? It’s not really my thing .… I hope it’s okay to say that—she’s clearly a smart writer.” The fact that this writer I so admired could pre­fer my piece to the one I’d just sent came as a revelation.

As it hap­pens, my mind is still not entirely con­vinced that I shouldn’t aspire to Havi. But I’m pre­pared to wait. Soon it will be on to some­thing else. (And if not, I still have the video.)

And vs. Or

Resurrection

Shortly after I launched this blog, a friend sug­gested that I fea­ture sto­ries about peo­ple who lost their jobs but ended up tri­umphant, which got me to think­ing about this seduc­tive and increas­ingly iconic Great Reces­sion storyline.

The appetite for such sto­ries is easy to under­stand. They’re a wel­come anti­dote to the anx­ious uncer­tainty that per­vades our times. They fuel our opti­mism, calm our fears. They tell us that no mat­ter how bleak things may seem they’re still likely to end well. “This is a series about peo­ple who stared down the Great Recession—and rein­vented them­selves along the way,” is how the online mag­a­zine Salon describes its series “My Bril­liant Sec­ond Career.”

But for all this narrative’s com­pelling appeal, I’ve found myself balk­ing at it, uneasy with the vision of a fan­tasy future squared off against the past. In par­tic­u­lar, I worry that in our eager rush towards hap­pier times, we risk los­ing sight of what these years have had to teach us—that we’ll come to view this era’s dif­fi­cul­ties as things that “shouldn’t  have hap­pened to me” rather than as a shared expe­ri­ence that shaped and trans­formed our lives.

Our indi­vid­u­al­ist cul­ture thrives on hier­ar­chies and dichotomies. Good vs. Bad. Suc­cess vs. Fail­ure. Win­ner vs. Loser.  It’s easy to fix­ate on secur­ing a spot on the right side of the divide. When we come to the end of a chal­leng­ing stretch, we often heave a sigh of relief and do our best to for­get.  That was then. This is now. I am not that per­son any­more. (Thank God, I am not that person!)

But there’s another way through such tran­si­tions, one that involves expand­ing to encom­pass even the hard­est parts of our pasts. I thought of this recently when read­ing my friend Alle­gra Jordan’s beau­ti­ful guest post on how the abrupt end of her mar­riage, which also coin­cided with a job loss, led her to launch her public-spirited Inno­va­tion Abbey con­sult­ing firm. What I espe­cially loved about his piece was its recognition—and acceptance—of the ways in which past and present nec­es­sar­ily coex­ist.  As William Faulkner famously wrote, “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”

Why does this mat­ter? Because once we accept that our lives are inher­ently messy, imper­fect, and informed by a past we didn’t choose, we can start to let go of the futile notion that life should be an end­less pro­gres­sion upwards.  We can be kinder to ourselves—and kinder to each other. We can start to understand—really understand—that we are not good or bad, suc­cesses or fail­ures, win­ners or losers. We are all of these things, many times over, and many more besides.

When goals collide

scream and shout

A friend’s two-year-old once pitched a tantrum on a stair­way land­ing between two floors of the fam­ily home.

What pro­voked the uproar? Once the furi­ous howls sub­sided, he choked out the fol­low­ing expla­na­tion: He wanted to be upstairs with his dad and down­stairs with his mom. He wanted both, at the same time. He didn’t want to choose.

I don’t know about you, but I can really relate. Espe­cially, dur­ing the past few weeks, as I’ve got­ten increas­ingly busy.  At any given moment, I’m con­flicted about what I should be doing—and doing next. There are so many things that need to be done, all vying for my attention.

Such con­flicts are espe­cially com­mon in times of tran­si­tion, at least that’s true for me. Right now, I’m jug­gling free­lance writ­ing with blog­ging, lead­ing a writ­ing work­shop for fos­ter kids, and look­ing for more pay­ing work. I’m also try­ing to orga­nize my home—a task that’s espe­cially press­ing since my lease is up in a cou­ple of months, at which point I’ll need to move. (Speak­ing of which, I’ll also need to find another place to live.) Also: resolve legal mat­ters relat­ing to the Plan B Nation trade­mark, pre­pare my 2011 taxes, help out a friend with cat care, and pack for a trip to Boston. Plus: Be hap­pier!

Not sur­pris­ingly, such inter­nal con­flicts are fer­tile breed­ing grounds for dis­sat­is­fac­tion. In her mega-bestseller Eat, Pray, Love, Eliz­a­beth Gilbert notes that Rumi once advised his stu­dents to write down the three things they most want in life.  If any item clashed with another, he warned them, they were des­tined for unhappiness.

But while this may be a sound obser­va­tion, it doesn’t tell us how to deal with such con­flicts when they arise in the course of daily life.  How do we best move for­ward while engaged in an inter­nal tug of war?

While I don’t have a magic bul­let (sorry!), I do have a few strate­gies that have helped me in the past, and to which I’m now resort­ing.  As is so often the case with this blog, I’m shar­ing what I need to remember.

1. There’s no “right” decision

Con­sider the sit­u­a­tion. Decide on next steps. Once you’ve made an informed deci­sion, do your best to ignore that voice that’s second-guessing you. That nag­ging sense that what­ever you’re doing isn’t the “right” thing? It’s just not true.

2. Keep mov­ing forwards

Some years back, at a sim­i­lar point of over­whelm, I remarked to a wildly effi­cient friend that I was tempted to give in and sim­ply do noth­ing at all.  He gave me a hor­ri­fied look: “No, no,” he said. “That way lies mad­ness!”  Which made me laugh, which is always a good thing. And besides, the point’s a good one.  A jour­ney of 1,000 miles begins with a sin­gle step, as the old say­ing goes.  For me, track­ing progress is an essen­tial strat­egy here.

3. Exer­cise

Sadly, I’m not one of those peo­ple who enjoys the actual expe­ri­ence of exer­cise, so I often let this one slide.  That being said, I always feel so much bet­ter after I’ve got­ten mov­ing that I’m deter­mined to do bet­ter in mak­ing it a reg­u­lar part of my life. In the mean­time, as they say in 12-step pro­grams: “Take my advice. I’m not using it.”

4. Say No

This is no time to add to your to-do list. Be ruth­less (or as ruth­less as you can be) about say­ing No. Need help? Read this.

5. Self-compassion

Sim­ply put, give your­self a break. Recent research sug­gests that self-compassion is more effec­tive than self-esteem in fos­ter­ing con­tent­ment. Rec­og­nize that you’re in a tough sit­u­a­tion and doing the best you can.  If you need some help in fig­ur­ing out how to go about this, Bud­dhist teacher and psy­chol­o­gist Tara Brach’s Rad­i­cal Accep­tance is a great start­ing point.

As I look ahead to the rest of the day, I still have that anx­ious feel­ing. Then I remind myself I’ve writ­ten this post. And that’s, at least, a start.

A Valentine’s date with Leonardo da Vinci

Every now and then you have a chance encounter that turns into some­thing far more. That’s what hap­pened to me with Alle­gra Jor­dan, whom I first met back in 2006 at a women’s pro­gram at Har­vard Busi­ness School.

Some­how we got to talk­ing. One thing led to another, and we made plans to meet for din­ner that evening at a restau­rant in Har­vard Square. Over upscale New Eng­land home cook­ing, we traded life sto­ries, find­ing many over­lap­ping inter­ests. Along with our Har­vard pro­fes­sional degrees (mine a J.D., hers an M.B.A.), we shared ties to the south­ern United States (she’d grown up in Alabama, while I’d spent years work­ing in Ten­nessee and Mis­sis­sippi). But most impor­tant of all was our shared con­cern with find­ing ways to bridge our sec­u­lar and spir­i­tual lives, whether they be devoutly Chris­t­ian (hers) or Bud­dhist eclec­tic (mine).

Flash for­ward five-plus years, and both of us have been through seis­mic changes—jobs, rela­tion­ships, geo­graphic moves.  At the same time, the com­mit­ments that brought us together remain very much the same, and what began as a sin­gle meal is now a solid friendship.

In this guest post, Alle­gra describes how her own Plan B Nation story led her to launch Inno­va­tion Abbey, a social justice-oriented con­sult­ing firm with projects around the world (and with which I’m now hon­ored to be affiliated). 

By Alle­gra Jordan

Feb­ru­ary 13, 2010. Snow is falling as my dog Belvedere and I pull out of my Chapel Hill dri­ve­way and begin the drive to Atlanta. By the time we reach the North Car­olina bor­der, traf­fic is at a stand­still. Eigh­teen wheel­ers slide pre­car­i­ously close to us along the rolling hills. The six-hour trip ends up tak­ing three times that long.

If this had been an ordi­nary trip, I would have turned around and waited for the roads to clear. But it was Valentine’s week­end, a bru­tal anniver­sary. One year before, I’d received a pink slip from my then-husband, fol­lowed by the same at work. The descent was so stun­ning it became intro­duc­tory mate­r­ial for a forth­com­ing book with the tongue-in-cheek work­ing title Is Fem­i­nism in Bad Shape? Check out Alle­gra. The story: our plucky hon­ors Har­vard Busi­ness School grad­u­ate mar­ries, pur­sues a career in inno­va­tion, sac­ri­fices, and ulti­mately becomes a cau­tion­ary tale for others.

Stick around for the week­end anniver­sary? No way.

Instead, I got tick­ets to the Leonardo da Vinci exhibit at the High Museum in Atlanta. My goal: To rest my eyes on con­se­quen­tial, centuries-old beauty. I hoped this expe­ri­ence would soothe and heal my heart. I was going to show up to life, show up to beauty, and show up to excel­lence. If I had to drive 18 hours, I would gladly do so.

But there was no “a-ha” moment for me on that bleak win­ter day. Tense from the drive, pro­tect­ing a badly wounded heart, I searched in vain for what I was seek­ing. I saw noth­ing that moved me, noth­ing that seemed to jus­tify the long and exhaust­ing trip.

Valentine’s Day dawned in Atlanta to below-freezing tem­per­a­tures. The sun had yet to rise when I embarked on my return trip over black-ice slicked roads. As I care­fully started the long drive back, my spir­its were low. It would have made sense to wait a while, but I didn’t have that lux­ury: I needed to make it back in time to pick up my sons at their father’s.

And then, just a few hours later, every­thing sud­denly shifted.

As I crossed the bor­der into South Car­olina around 10 a.m., the sun peeked into view. As if on cue, the air seemed to warm. My ten­sion and anx­i­ety drained away, leav­ing a feel­ing of calm. For the first time in three days, I finally relaxed. It was then the bless­ing came.

I can only describe it as an epiphany. And epipha­nies or day­dreams are funny, inex­plic­a­ble things. Neu­ro­log­i­cally, I can spec­u­late that after I finally relaxed the exec­u­tive cen­ter of my brain, I opened the door to a series of neuro-tonal images. It was a bit like being awake and dream­ing at the same time.

I saw Leonardo sit­ting on a lad­der. I drew closer.

Why are you here?” I asked.

I can help you,” he said.

How? There’s no place for me.”

There was no place for me either—I did so many dif­fer­ent things and few of them fit with each other. Even Michelan­gelo made fun of me for that big horse I tried. But if I could make it in the 1500s, then per­haps you can too.”

But my work sit­u­a­tion, my home life—I’ve been so betrayed.”

Have you ever worked for a Sforza?”

I laughed. The Sforza coat of arms includes a viper eat­ing a child. It’s hard to think of a more threat­en­ing boss than that.

If I could do it, per­haps you can too,” the mas­ter said. “I’ll help.”

That was it. The epiphany was over.

Nobel Prize win­ner Toni Mor­ri­son writes that a true and good friend is some­one who takes the pieces of “who I am” and gives them “back to me in all the right order.” In that sense, this epiphany helped me see the path for­ward. In those moments, I found my tribe.

One year later I started Inno­va­tion Abbey, recruit­ing a first-class team that shares my ded­i­ca­tion to evidence-based inno­va­tion steeped in deep wis­dom about how peo­ple really work. Since our launch, we’ve worked in 10 coun­tries in Asia and two in Africa, as well as in the United States. Our projects are start­ing to bear fruit, though the work of inno­va­tion— inno­vare or renewal in Latin—is the work of a lifetime.

Our com­pet­i­tive edge? We believe that human beings, not data or processes, are the root cause of inno­va­tion. Yes, peo­ple of faith need peo­ple of spread­sheets, and I have been a per­son of spread­sheets. But it also works the other way: data and processes need the human spirit.

Our name hear­kens back to the ancient abbey sys­tem of Europe and Asia, which man­aged to com­bine oper­a­tions and deep knowl­edge of peo­ple to show a bet­ter way for­ward. While far from per­fect, the 1,400 Cluny abbeys nev­er­the­less helped bring Europe out of chaos, war, and dis­ease 1,100 years ago­—and with­out a sin­gle mobile phone.

I’ll close with a humble—but telling—story from a project we com­pleted in Laos late last year.

In the Lao cul­ture, there isn’t a word for inno­va­tion. But there is a word for love.

We were invited to work with a pub­lic health admin­is­tra­tor work­ing to teach her team about innovation.

She gath­ered her whole team—including her driver—to talk about inno­va­tion, using the mate­ri­als we had pro­vided as a jump­ing off point. The first dis­cus­sion caused con­fu­sion. But the team did not give up. “We don’t know what this is but we love our regional man­ager who tells us this is impor­tant. We will do it for this man­ager whom we respect,” was the gen­eral consensus.

The tide finally began to turn when the Lao team con­nected in Thai with another group study­ing inno­va­tion with us. After this, the Lao team began to feel more com­fort­able with the inno­va­tion process and related con­cepts, the team leader told us. How did she know? Here’s what she said:

I got in my car. Usu­ally you tell the dri­ver where to go street by street and they drive you that way. But this time the dri­ver turned to me and said, ‘I’ve been think­ing. For two years we’ve dri­ven that way. I know a shorter route. May we try it?’”

When I heard this, my heart lifted. Think of the time value in money! How much time had two years of the direc­tive mind­set cost the team? And how much time might be saved going for­ward? Not to men­tion the larger changes likely to fol­low as the inno­va­tion mind­set begins to take root and flour­ish.  And sig­nif­i­cantly, the break­through stemmed from love—from the feel­ings of respect and con­nec­tion that bound team mem­bers to their regional manager.

I see inno­va­tion as the response of human­ity strug­gling to renew in the midst of a com­pet­i­tive and dys­func­tional world where there are amaz­ing things yet to be dis­cov­ered. I’ve had to give up almost every­thing to gain this wis­dom. It’s becom­ing slowly appar­ent to me that it is worth it.

It’s our chal­lenge to build a beau­ti­ful future together on the cold embers of a past that did not work. We have the spirit of a genius engi­neer, painter, drafts­man, sculp­tor, and inven­tor that can meet us, even today. As I walk into this unknown, and poten­tially beau­ti­ful, unbounded future, I do so with a new con­fi­dence that I’m not alone. I’m search­ing for—and start­ing to find—the mem­bers of my lost tribe, the bril­liant, vision­ary, heart-centered tribe of Leonardo da Vinci.

Note: To learn more about Inno­va­tion Abbey and its projects, email Alle­gra with ques­tions or to request an inau­gural set of white papers: “The Devil in Inno­va­tion,” “Redis­cov­er­ing Ancient Wis­dom about Mod­ern Inno­va­tion,” and “What We Learn about Inno­va­tion with the Bot­tom Bil­lion.” Read­ers are also warmly invited to attend a Tedx event on the theme “Beloved Com­mu­nity” in Chapel Hill on March 3, 2012.

Awakening Joy in Plan B Nation

Joyful Runway

Much has been writ­ten about the psy­cho­log­i­cal costs of job loss and other fall-out of the Great Reces­sion, but far less ink has been spilled over how we can best address them.

The worst things in life start show­ing up when peo­ple expe­ri­ence extended unem­ploy­ment,” asserts Gallup Chair­man and CEO Jim Clifton in his chill­ing man­i­festo The Com­ing Jobs War, which paints a dire pic­ture of a global job short­age. “Those wounded will prob­a­bly never fully recover.”

In a sim­i­lar vein, Atlantic jour­nal­ist Don Peck cites a trou­bling litany of con­se­quences stem­ming from long-term job­less­ness, includ­ing “grow­ing iso­la­tion, warp­ing of fam­ily dynam­ics, and a slow sep­a­ra­tion from main­stream soci­ety,” as he fur­ther details in Pinched: How the Great Reces­sion Has Nar­rowed Our Futures and What We Can Do About It.

My reac­tion to such obser­va­tions is mixed.

On the one hand, I wel­come the acknowl­edg­ment that the Great Reces­sion has exerted unprece­dented stress on mil­lions of Amer­i­cans. It strikes me as a much-needed anti­dote to the view that the job­less, foreclosed-upons, and other casu­al­ties of these new hard times just need to buck up, to opt for the sort of relent­less cheer skew­ered by cul­tural critic Bar­bara Ehren­re­ich in Bright-Sided: How Pos­i­tive Think­ing is Under­min­ing Amer­ica.

On the other hand, it strikes me as unnec­es­sar­ily dis­em­pow­er­ing to sim­ply give in, to believe that there’s noth­ing we can do to change our rela­tion­ship to the bad things that come our way.

It’s in this spirit that I’m embark­ing on med­i­ta­tion teacher James Baraz’s 10-month online class Awak­en­ing Joy. I first heard about the pro­gram from some like-minded friends (read: friends not prone to the afore­men­tioned relent­less pos­i­tive think­ing) and decided to give it a try. My ini­tial skep­ti­cism largely faded when I learned that no one is turned away for finan­cial rea­sons. (I myself opted to pay a small frac­tion of the total cost.)

Baraz—a found­ing teacher at the Spirit Rock Med­i­ta­tion Cen­ter in Woodacre, California—draws heav­ily on the Bud­dhist tra­di­tion, but as he makes clear in the first class, the pro­gram is in no way lim­ited to any par­tic­u­lar reli­gious faith.

So is it pos­si­ble to “awaken joy” when we’re fac­ing huge chal­lenges?  Baraz says Yes. Where his approach dif­fers sig­nif­i­cantly from many other pro­po­nents of pos­i­tive think­ing is that he—like the Buddha—is focused on the prac­ti­cal strate­gies that allow us to do this.  Rather than say­ing  “just do it,” his focus is on how to do it.

The first step? Sim­ply cul­ti­vat­ing the inten­tion to be happy. To this end, Baraz and his teach­ing team pro­vide a num­ber of exer­cises and prac­tices, includ­ing the act of remind­ing our­selves again and again of our inten­tion. Another sug­ges­tion: Mak­ing a con­scious deci­sion to rec­og­nize and rel­ish moments of well-being. (Pos­i­tive psy­chol­ogy acolytes refer to this as “savor­ing.”) The the­ory is that where we choose to place our mind goes far to  deter­mine how happy we are.

More than 2,000 peo­ple have tested it, so it’s not some airy-fairy idea,” Baraz said of the class, in a 2008 O mag­a­zine inter­view. “I’ve learned that it’s pos­si­ble to change, no mat­ter what your his­tory or the lim­it­ing beliefs you’ve held on to. If you have the inten­tion to be happy and you do the prac­tices, if you give it your best shot and are very patient, it works.”

That being said, the Bud­dha told his stu­dents to not take any­thing on faith—rather to “see for your­self.” That’s exactly what I’ll be doing, and I’m curi­ous to explore what hap­pens. Inter­ested in join­ing me? Click here for sign-up infor­ma­tion.

Plan B Nation: The Podcast (now on Work Stew)

Per­haps the best thing about start­ing this blog has been the oppor­tu­nity to meet really cool peo­ple who are think­ing and writ­ing about the very things that most inter­est me.

This fact hit home again ear­lier this week, when Work Stew found­ing edi­tor Kate Gace Wal­ton con­tacted me about doing a pod­cast for her site.

Like me, Kate is some­thing of a cul­ture straddler—a Har­vard grad who spent time in the cor­po­rate world (she has an MBA from Wharton)—before engi­neer­ing a life more in line with her val­ues and inter­ests, a tran­si­tion she elo­quently describes in the essay Ran­dom Acts of Busi­ness.  A mother of two, she now works in recruit­ing near her Bain­bridge Island, Wash­ing­ton home.

In the year since launch­ing Work Stew, Kate has gath­ered dozens of sto­ries reflect­ing a vast assort­ment of work expe­ri­ences, with the goal of cre­at­ing a forum that both informs and inspires. The essays and pod­casts are as fas­ci­nat­ing as they are diverse. Hol­ly­wood screen­writer, par­ti­cle physi­cist, min­is­ter, ex-spy, restau­rant cook, and flight-attendant-turned-gorilla-caretaker are just a sam­pling of the paths represented.

My own recent con­ver­sa­tion with Kate about life in Plan B Nation cov­ered a lot of ground, rang­ing from what my career has in com­mon with a tra­di­tional mar­riage plot to what comes next for all of us in the New Econ­omy. Want to lis­ten in? Click here.

5 things I learned when The Organizer paid a visit

The Orga­nizer takes stock

My friend Heidi is a pro­fes­sional orga­nizer, and when she heard that this month’s Life Exper­i­ment is all about Cre­at­ing Order, she offered to get me started.

I jumped at the opportunity.

She arrived promptly at 8:15 am, full of reas­sur­ances. “I don’t make judg­ments,” she said, more than once. “It’s about you and how you live.  My work is very per­sonal, and every­thing is confidential.”

I’d done lit­tle to pre­pare for the visit; Heidi wanted to see what things looked like when I hadn’t made a spe­cial effort. Before we got to work, I took her on a quick top-to-bottom tour—from my clothes– and book-strewn bed­room to my chaotic base­ment, a potter’s field for old elec­tron­ics, work files, and memorabilia.

Over the next two hours, we made sub­stan­tial inroads, far more than I would have thought pos­si­ble for such a short ses­sion. We started out by going through piles on my din­ing room table, where I’d gath­ered some of my most chal­leng­ing small orga­ni­za­tion projects.

For exam­ple: What do you do with that col­lec­tion of ran­dom screws, nails, and other mys­te­ri­ous hard­ware items?

Answer: Your throw it out.

Now this might not be the case for some­one who is handy and does lots of home improve­ment projects, but as soon as Heidi told me I could pitch this stuff, I felt instant relief.

And, as she explained it, that’s a big part of what a pro­fes­sional orga­nizer does: Gives you per­mis­sion to toss stuff that you can’t seem to toss on your own.  (Or, as she diplo­mat­i­cally put it, sur­vey­ing my liv­ing room: “It’s my job to get you to think about things, so this sort of sit­u­a­tion doesn’t ensue.”)

That being said, Heidi cer­tainly didn’t pres­sure me; she mainly just asked questions.

Why do you need the instruc­tions to your blender?” she inquired.

I skimmed through the lit­tle book­let. “Look! There are recipes! I’m going to put this with my recipe books.”

She gave me a long look. “Really?” she said. Really?

After that she let it go, except for one final obser­va­tion. “I’ll bet you never go to that blender thing to make a recipe out of it. (Chances are she’s entirely right, but for now, I’m still keep­ing it.)

This isn’t the first time I’ve made an effort to be more orga­nized (over the years, as I recounted in Salon, I’ve spent thou­sands of dol­lars on stor­age), and some of Heidi’s tips—such as the adage to “put like with like”—were already famil­iar to me.

But other truths came as either novel insights or much-needed reminders. For the record, here they are:

1. No one wants your old cas­sette tapes.

No one. Absolutely no one.  After a rejec­tion from Good­will, I’d been plan­ning to move on. Heidi told me not to bother.

2. You don’t have to be like your parents

I’m sort of like my mother,” I explained, as I dithered over whether to dis­card some melted-down can­dle remnants.

Heidi’s matter-of-fact response: “You don’t have to be.”

3.  Just because some­thing was once pretty doesn’t mean it still is.

I loved this,” I said wist­fully, gaz­ing at my one-time favorite Vera Bradley tote bag, now torn and stained.

I won­dered if I should keep it—until Heidi’s voice broke in. “You can’t donate that,” she said prac­ti­cally. “You have to throw it away.”

A scummy can­dle holder with a flo­ral pat­tern elicited a sim­i­lar response.

Me: “It’s sort of pretty.”

Heidi: “Not so much anymore.”

Bonus tip:  If some­thing has sen­ti­men­tal value but no cur­rent use, think of tak­ing a dig­i­tal photo and dis­card­ing the object itself.

4.  Projects take less time than you think they will …

It’s going to take me hours just to go through that,” I said ges­tur­ing to a pile of boxes on the stair­way land­ing as we emerged from the basement.

Heidi stopped me right there. “Why?” she said.

Oh, you know,” I said vaguely. “Lots of ran­dom things in var­i­ous places, have to go through it all.”

Well, let’s just see,” said Heidi.

And you know what? Most of those boxes were empty, except for pack­ing mate­ri­als. After five or 10 min­utes, only a small stack of papers and binders remained to be sorted.

5.  Unless they take more

As she gath­ered up her things, prepar­ing to leave, Heidi said: “You know you have a lot of work to do, right?”

The words brought me back to earth. I’d felt like we’d accom­plished so much! And yet, this was just a beginning.

How long do you think the whole house will take?”

Well, it depends on how much time you spend but, maybe  … a month or so?”

Hap­pily, one month is exactly the length of my Cre­at­ing Order Life Exper­i­ment. Three days down, 27 to go. Yes, I’m just get­ting started.

Spe­cial offer: Heidi—whose full name is Heidi Robinson—is offer­ing a two-hour orga­niz­ing ses­sion for $50—that’s 50% off her usual rate—to the first five Northampton-area Plan B Nation read­ers to con­tact her. You can reach her by phone at 413–219-7433 or email her at heidilisa43@yahoo.com.

Why the New York Times was right to pick on Apple

Photo: Matt Wakeman

Days after the New York Times pub­lished a dev­as­tat­ing exposé of the myr­iad human costs of our beloved iPhones and iPads—includ­ing one espe­cially grisly and graph­i­cally detailed Chi­nese fac­tory explo­sion fatality—Apple defend­ers swung into gear.

[Apple CEO Tim] Cook has every right to be miffed about the Times report. His com­pany is being sin­gled out,” Larry Dig­nan wrote in ZDNet.

The sec­ond sen­tence is accu­rate. The first, to my mind, is not. Here’s why the New York Times was right to train its sights on Apple:

1.  We are wired to respond to stories.

We do not respond to the gen­eral. We respond to specifics. That’s why news fea­tures always focus on a sin­gle salient exam­ple, one com­pelling case that draws us into the larger story. Trial lawyers know this, mar­keters know this, and yes, reporters know this. And no, it isn’t ratio­nal, but we are not ratio­nal crea­tures. This sin­gu­lar recog­ni­tion is what accounts for the ongo­ing decline of clas­si­cal eco­nom­ics, along with the con­comi­tant rise of its behav­ioral coun­ter­part.

2. “All the kids do it” is not an excuse

Yes, the Times doubt­less tar­geted Apple because “it’s the big dog on the tech block,” as Dig­nan puts it. But so what? Does that make its human rights infrac­tions any less hor­ri­fy­ing? No one is sug­gest­ing that we stop with Apple,  but it seems like a fine place to start.

3. Apple users care more.

Here, I will be shame­lessly anec­do­tal. Based on per­sonal observation—heavily informed by lines drawn when I con­sulted my Face­book net­work on the Apple vs. Win­dows pur­chase question—consumers of Apple prod­ucts (who dis­pro­por­tion­ately hail from the cre­ative econ­omy) are more prone to out­rage over human rights vio­la­tions than are invet­er­ate Win­dows users. Okay, I’ve said my piece. Let the flam­ing begin.

I have not been a big fan of the Times in recent months, with its tone-deaf fea­tures on “Manly Bags for the Week­end War­rior,” includ­ing a snappy lit­tle $2,550 Louis Vuit­ton num­ber (at a time when our nation’s real war­riors are return­ing home to record unem­ploy­ment) and why the nation’s job­less oppose extend­ing unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits (which, of course, and speak­ing from expe­ri­ence, is patently ridiculous).

In this case, how­ever, the Times made the right call. Bot­tom line: You don’t get to fla­grantly trade off human lives against profit. That’s why the noto­ri­ous Ford Pinto memo was so scandalous—and why it sparked pop­u­lar out­rage along with a (later-reduced) $125 mil­lion dam­age award. (As some read­ers will recall, the memo employed a  cost-benefit analy­sis to pre­dict that a given design change would save 180 lives but cost an extra $11 per car, with a total cost esti­mated at $137 mil­lion ver­sus a $49.5 mil­lion price tag put on the antic­i­pated deaths and injuries. Ford opted not to make the change.)

It’s true that, at the mar­gins, choices do get tougher. Because, yes, life is risky and everything—even cross­ing the street—entails a cer­tain risk. At the mar­gins, we are forced to make tough deci­sions, to pri­or­i­tize com­pet­ing con­cerns. But that’s not the case with Apple. Right now, we are nowhere near those margins.

To add your voice to the thou­sands demand­ing that Apple improve global work­ing con­di­tions, please join me in sign­ing this peti­tion.

Life Experiment #2: Creating Order

Order is every­thing,” my friend Melissa once remarked, more than two decades ago.

When an off­hand com­ment sticks in your mind, there’s likely a very good rea­son why, and in this case, that rea­son is read­ily appar­ent every­where I look.

I am liv­ing in chaos.

It is a fer­tile, vibrant chaos, to be sure—fascinating books, scrib­bled notes, Christ­mas dec­o­ra­tions, piles of col­or­ful clothes, fliers for events I’d like to attend, bowls of local apples and onions, recipes I’d like to make. At times, I view the mess as akin to compost—materials that make my days both richer and more nourishing.

But mostly it’s a way bet­ter metaphor than it is a way of life. It’s frus­trat­ing, and it’s time-consuming, and some­times it’s even expen­sive. (This morn­ing, I searched for some books about orga­ni­za­tion that I’d picked up years ago. Tellingly, I couldn’t find them.)

Which is why February’s Life Exper­i­ment will be about Cre­at­ing Order.

As some of you may recall, I’ve dubbed 2012 my Year of Exper­i­ments. Each month, I’m embark­ing on a new set of activ­i­ties around a par­tic­u­lar theme. At the end of each month, I’ll give some thought to how my life has shifted and share the results.

In par­tic­u­lar, I’m inter­ested in how activ­i­ties that are appar­ently unre­lated affect and inform each other. Here, I think of the old say­ing “Trust in God and clean house.” (Not to be con­fused with another old say­ing: “Trust in God and keep your pow­der dry.”) How will bring­ing order to my liv­ing space change my life in other ways? Stay tuned for the answer.

Or bet­ter yet, join me! Make Feb­ru­ary your month of cre­at­ing order—or pick a Life Exper­i­ment of your own and watch to see how things change.

As a reminder, here are my sug­gested guide­lines for Life Exper­i­ments. (I described these in more detail in a pre­vi­ous post.):

1.  Select process goals, not out­come goals

2. Select activ­i­ties that are directly related to your larger goals

3. Pick activ­i­ties that are sat­is­fy­ing (and even fun) in themselves.

And now, here it is, my per­sonal Life Exper­i­ment #2: Every day I will take one or more spe­cific and quan­tifi­able actions aimed at cre­at­ing order at home. (Exam­ples: I will take 10 arti­cles of cloth­ing to Good­will. I will spend an hour sort­ing through office papers.)

I’ll keep myself account­able by track­ing the actions I take each day. (In case you’re won­der­ing, an update on January’s Life Exper­i­ment is shortly forthcoming.)

 ♦

Order, orga­ni­za­tion, neatness—these are not qual­i­ties that come nat­u­rally to me. I will never be that per­son who, as hap­pi­ness maven Gretchen Rubin once did, explains my com­pat­i­bil­ity with a mate in terms of a shared affin­ity for order, (“He’ll  say ‘Let’s take 20 min­utes and tidy up,’” Rubin told the New York Times, in describ­ing her husband.)

I do, how­ever, think that I can do bet­ter.  Maybe a lot bet­ter.  I plan to give it a shot.

Plan B Nation bookshelf: Aging as a Spiritual Practice (+ book giveaway)

Aging is depress­ing,” a friend announced, after see­ing Iron Lady, the new Mar­garet Thatcher biopic star­ring Meryl Streep.

This is no doubt true, at least for some of us, some of the time. But even more to the point is this salient fact: It hap­pens to all of us.

Given the inevitabil­ity of grow­ing older, it seems sen­si­ble to give some thought to how we can mine this expe­ri­ence for what­ever good it con­tains. In this spirit, I was drawn to read Bud­dhist teacher Lewis Richmond’s new book Aging as a Spir­i­tual Prac­tice: A Con­tem­pla­tive Guide to Grow­ing Older and Wiser (Gotham Books 2012).

Richmond’s mes­sage is twofold: On the one hand, every­thing we love is des­tined to change, age, and pass away. On the other, “every moment brings with it new oppor­tu­ni­ties” if we can only stay open to them.  In writ­ing this book, he set out to help us do just that.

As Rich­mond sees it, our goal should be flexibility—physical, men­tal, and emotional—qualities that research has linked to longer and health­ier lives. With this end in mind, he offers an array of Buddhist-infused med­i­ta­tions and tools along with shar­ing his own life story and those of oth­ers, includ­ing sev­eral inspir­ing exam­ples of “the extra­or­di­nary elderly.”

Rich­mond stresses that the chal­lenges of aging aren’t lim­ited to those on the far side of mid­dle age—and may not even cor­re­late with chrono­log­i­cal age. “I’m twenty-seven, and I’ve sud­denly real­ized that I’m grow­ing old,” wrote one cor­re­spon­dent.  “I’m seventy-three, and I’ve never felt younger,” wrote another.

But while our inner expe­ri­ences may dif­fer, there are com­mon denom­i­na­tors. “Aging is not just change, but irre­versible change—for bet­ter or worse,” Rich­mond observes. Some may find this insight depress­ing, but I found it strangely lib­er­at­ing. If you’re any­thing like me, you spent a lot of your young adult­hood lean­ing into the future, striv­ing to cre­ate the con­di­tions for what­ever life you thought would make you happy. For me, an upside of reach­ing mid­dle age has been an enhanced capac­ity to live in the present moment (which, as the Bud­dhists have told us for mil­len­nia, is all that we ever really have).

I was also struck by the extent to which the skills Rich­mond says we need to suc­cess­fully nav­i­gate aging have much in com­mon with those needed to suc­cess­fully nav­i­gate Plan B Nation, regard­less of age. For exam­ple, Rich­mond talks about the impor­tance of cre­at­ing new iden­ti­ties to replace those we have lost—as true for a newly unem­ployed as it is for an aging retiree.

In par­tic­u­lar, I liked this exer­cise. I plan to try it. You might want to try it too:

Make three lists. In the first, include what has been lost in the last three or five or 10 years (you pick the time frame).  In the sec­ond, include what has been gained. In the third, include new pos­si­bil­i­ties for replen­ish­ing your iden­tity.  And with this last list, Rich­mond urges, “Reach as high and as far as you can.”

Note: Gotham Books has kindly pro­vided an extra copy of Aging as a Spir­i­tual Prac­tice for me to give away. For a chance to win the book, leave a com­ment below.  At the bot­tom of your com­ment, please indi­cate you’d like to be entered in the draw­ing by typ­ing the word “give­away.” The draw­ing is next weekend.